Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Working group Track A

Scholarly publishing

The Scholarly publishing and editorial vocabulary working group defines the terms that carry a manuscript from submission to the published record — article types, licence and open-access status, peer-review models, correction and retraction notices, and the contributor-role vocabulary of the CRediT taxonomy. It works with NISO, COPE, ICMJE and Crossref to keep CASRAI's dictionary entries aligned with the JATS tag set and the editorial standards publishers already implement, so a term like "corresponding author" or a CRediT contributor role means the same thing in a submission system, a JATS XML record and a CRIS.

12
Community seats
Plus chair and co-chair
Open
Applications
Candidates under review
Forming
Cadence
Quarterly virtual sessions; two release windows per year (March and September).
2026
Formed
2026 charter round

Charter and scope

What this working group covers

The Scholarly publishing and editorial vocabulary working group defines the terms that carry a manuscript from submission to the published record — article types, licence and open-access status, peer-review models, correction and retraction notices, and the contributor-role vocabulary of the CRediT taxonomy. It works with NISO, COPE, ICMJE and Crossref to keep CASRAI's dictionary entries aligned with the JATS tag set and the editorial standards publishers already implement, so a term like "corresponding author" or a CRediT contributor role means the same thing in a submission system, a JATS XML record and a CRIS.

  • CRediT contributor roles taxonomy (ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022) and author-contribution statement wording
  • Article-type and manuscript-status vocabulary (original research, review, preprint, erratum)
  • Peer-review model terminology (single-blind, double-blind, open, transparent review)
  • Correction, retraction and expression-of-concern notice types
  • Licensing and open-access status vocabulary (CC licence variants, embargo terms)
  • JATS XML tag alignment for editorial and contributor metadata
  • Editorial-workflow terms bridging submission systems to CRIS and institutional repositories

Composition

Current composition

Chair

Applications under review

Candidates are being assessed for the 2026 forming round. Two-year term, renewable once.

Submit your candidacy →

Co-chair

Accepting candidates

Optional second chair, prioritised for regional or sector balance.

Submit your candidacy →

Community seats

Accepting candidates for 12 seats

Seats are allocated against a published rubric covering domain expertise, institutional diversity, regional balance, and an explicit slot for early-career researchers.

Apply for a community seat →

Deliverables

Planned and delivered deliverables

  1. Scholarly publishing vocabulary v1 covering article types, peer-review models and editorial notice types
  2. CRediT taxonomy author-statement guidance cross-walked to JATS XML for publisher implementers
  3. Cross-walk: CASRAI dictionary terms to the NISO JATS tag set
  4. Editorial notice-type taxonomy (correction, retraction, erratum, expression of concern)
  5. Implementer guidance for manuscript-submission and editorial-management systems

Recent activity

Working-group cadence and milestones

Illustrative working-group cadence for the 2026 forming round. Substantive deliverables and meeting minutes will be linked here as the group convenes.

  • 2026-05-15 · Milestone

    Working group forming — call for chair candidates

    Open call for chair and co-chair of the Scholarly publishing working group. Candidates are under review.

  • 2026-04-22 · Release

    Domain scope confirmed for v2026.2

    Scope of the Scholarly publishing domain confirmed against the v2026.2 dictionary release plan.

  • 2026-03-10 · Added

    Forming round announced

    CASRAI announced the 2026 forming round for all 24 working groups, with seat allocations and review rubric published.

Open consultations

Currently in public comment

Currently none open. Subscribe via /get-involved/comment for future calls.

External bodies

Standards and organisations we work with

Going deeper on CASRAI

Related CASRAI guidance

Adjacent working groups

Related working groups

How to join

Apply to a seat on this working group

This working group is receiving candidates for the 2026 forming round. The application is short — name, institution, ORCID iD (optional), the seat you are applying for, and a paragraph on why this domain. Decisions are returned within four weeks of the close of the open-call window.

FAQ

Frequently asked

What are examples of author contributions?

The CRediT taxonomy (ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022) sets out 14 standardized author-contribution roles, including Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, and Writing – original draft. A single author can hold several roles on one paper, and each role carries a formal definition plus sample statement wording. CASRAI's CRediT hub documents the full role set that most journals now ask authors to select from during manuscript submission.

What are the five author contributions?

There is no official five-item list within the CRediT taxonomy itself — the ANSI/NISO Z39.104-2022 standard defines 14 distinct contributor roles, not five. Some publisher summaries and reference pages cluster those 14 roles into a handful of broader categories, such as conceptual work, data and analysis, writing, and administration, which is likely the source of the 'five contributions' framing seen in search results. CASRAI's dictionary and CRediT hub list all 14 roles individually so authors and editors can select every role that actually applies, rather than a shortened set.

What does this working group do?

The Scholarly publishing working group is the community body that drafts, reviews and ratifies dictionary entries for the Scholarly publishing domain. It maintains scope, cross-walks to adjacent standards and the cadence of public review. Its remit is summarised on this page; the canonical terms it stewards live at /dictionary/domain/publishing.

Who can apply to join?

Working-group membership is open to qualified practitioners — researchers, research-office staff, librarians, publishers, repository managers, integrity officers, CRIS administrators, regulators and funders. Institutional membership is not required. The qualification test is competence and time, not affiliation. Apply via the working-group application form.

What is the time commitment?

Cadence: Quarterly virtual sessions; two release windows per year (March and September).. Time commitment averages four hours per quarter for an active member, more for a chair. Asynchronous review happens between meetings via email. Chairs are recognised on the editorial masthead and serve a two-year term, renewable once.

How are seats allocated?

Each working group has 12 community seats plus a chair and (optionally) a co-chair. Seats are filled by an open call reviewed against a published rubric: domain expertise, institutional diversity, regional balance, and an explicit slot for early-career researchers. Applications for the 2026 forming round are open and candidates are currently under review — see how to apply.

Can my institution sponsor a seat?

Institutional sponsorship is welcome but is not a route to a guaranteed seat. Sponsors support meeting infrastructure, public-comment publication and contributor honoraria; they receive named acknowledgement on the working-group page and in release notes. Sponsorship enquiries go to [email protected]. Seat selection remains on merit.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.