Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0

Direct comparison

Mendeley Data vs. Zenodo: Repository Fit

Compare Mendeley Data and Zenodo on storage limits, DOI issuance, disciplinary scope, versioning, and licensing to pick a repository.

Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board

Last updated

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Mendeley Data vs. Zenodo: Repository Fit

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

How do Mendeley Data, Zenodo compare side by side?

The table below compares Mendeley Data, Zenodo across 9 procurement-relevant dimensions, from operator / institutional backing through best for.

Side-by-side comparison

DimensionMendeley DataZenodo
Operator / institutional backingElsevier (commercial academic publisher)CERN, with OpenAIRE and EU funding/integration support; open-source InvenioRDM platform
Disciplinary scopeGeneralist — any research discipline; scoped to datasetsGeneralist — any research discipline; also accepts software, preprints, posters, and other outputs
Storage limit per dataset10GB free personal account; up to 100GB with an institutional subscription50GB default per record (up to 100 files); 150GB additional account-level storage; larger one-time quota available on request
DOI issuanceProvisional DOI reserved at draft creation, permanent DOI minted on publish, registered via DataCite (British Library as registrant)DOI minted automatically at publication via DataCite; distinguishes a version DOI (one specific version) from a concept DOI (always resolves to the latest version)
VersioningFull version history; published versions viewable and comparableNew version created per update, each with its own version DOI linked to a shared concept DOI
LicensingDefault CC BY 4.0; dropdown of Creative Commons and open software/hardware licensesDefault CC0; license required for every public upload, drawn from a long list of Creative Commons and other open licenses
Curation / moderationModerated for compliance, typically within 2 business days of submissionNo mandatory review outside Communities; optional community curator review via "submit for review"
Software / code archivingNot a focus — scoped to datasetsDirect GitHub integration to archive a tagged release and mint it a DOI
Best forElsevier/ScienceDirect-centered workflows, or institutions with a larger contracted storage tierArchiving code alongside data, EU-funded projects needing OpenAIRE reporting integration, or datasets over 10GB without institutional Mendeley Data access

Common questions

Common questions about Mendeley Data vs Zenodo

Is Mendeley Data the same as the Mendeley reference manager?

+

No. Mendeley Data (data.mendeley.com) is Elsevier's dataset repository. Mendeley the reference manager is a separate product for collecting citations, annotating PDFs, and generating bibliographies — see CASRAI's reference manager comparison for that tool specifically.

Do both Mendeley Data and Zenodo issue a real, citable DOI?

+

Yes. Both register DOIs through DataCite. Mendeley Data reserves a provisional DOI at dataset creation and mints the permanent one on publication; Zenodo mints a DOI automatically on publication and additionally provides a concept DOI that always points to a dataset's latest version.

Which has more free storage, Mendeley Data or Zenodo?

+

Zenodo's default per-record limit (50GB, per Zenodo's own documentation) is larger than Mendeley Data's free personal-account limit (10GB, per Mendeley Data's own FAQ). Mendeley Data's institutional tier can go up to 100GB depending on the subscribing institution's agreement with Elsevier. Confirm current figures directly with each provider, since both have changed limits over time.

Can I deposit code or software on either repository?

+

Zenodo explicitly supports software as a deposit type and integrates directly with GitHub to archive a tagged release automatically. Mendeley Data is scoped to datasets rather than treating code as a first-class deposit type.

Does either repository review datasets before publishing them?

+

Both apply lighter review than a curated domain repository. Mendeley Data moderates submissions for compliance with its terms, typically within two business days. Zenodo has no mandatory review for a standalone upload, though an optional community-curator review is available when submitting into a Zenodo Community.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.