Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AStablev2026.2

Acknowledged contributor

An individual whose contribution to a research output is recognised in the acknowledgements section rather than by authorship, typically because their contribution does not meet all four ICMJE authorship criteria but is substantive enough to warrant named credit.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Acknowledged contributor

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A research nurse who coordinated patient recruitment, named in the acknowledgements with their consent

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A funder thanked in a generic 'we acknowledge funding from X' line is not an acknowledged contributor in the named-person sense

Editorial commentary

An acknowledged contributor is named in a research output’s acknowledgements section rather than in the author byline. ICMJE recommends this route specifically for contributions that are real and substantive but that do not meet all four authorship criteria — conception or design (or acquisition/analysis/interpretation of data), drafting or critically reviewing the work, final approval of the published version, and accountability for its accuracy. Naming someone in acknowledgements is not a lesser courtesy; ICMJE treats it as the correct, expected outcome for this class of contribution, not a fallback.

How it differs from related terms: “Acknowledged contributor” names the mechanism — credit placed in the acknowledgements section — while non-author contributor is the broader status covering anyone left off the byline, including people credited through a CRediT-only contributor list or a materials/funding statement instead. Roles commonly (though not always) credited this way include a domain expert advisor, technical staff, and a medical writer — each becomes a co-author instead, not an acknowledged contributor, once their input rises to a CRediT-recognised role and meets all four ICMJE criteria.

Good practice names the person, their affiliation, and the specific help given — “we thank Dr. X for statistical advice on the primary model” — rather than a blanket thank-you, and obtains the person’s consent before publishing their name. Journals that require a formal author contribution statement alongside the byline increasingly expect the same specificity for acknowledgements.

References

  • ICMJE Recommendations, “Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors”
  • COPE Authorship Discussion Document (2019)

Also known as

Acknowledged person · Named acknowledgement

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Acknowledged contributor"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/acknowledged-contributor" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/acknowledged-contributor",
  "name": "Acknowledged contributor",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/acknowledged-contributor",
  "description": "An individual whose contribution to a research output is recognised in the acknowledgements section rather than by authorship, typically because their contribution does not meet all four ICMJE authorship criteria but is substantive enough to warrant named credit.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/credit-extensions#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/acknowledged-contributor",
  "sameAs": [
    "Acknowledged person",
    "Named acknowledgement"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T01:57:49",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:04:25",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.