Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AStablev2026.2

Author responsibility (for AI use)

The principle that human authors retain full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, originality, ethical sourcing, and lack of plagiarism of all content in a scholarly work, regardless of which portions were drafted, suggested, or generated by an AI tool.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Author responsibility (for AI use)

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    An author who verifies every citation an LLM produced before including it in a manuscript

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    An author who pleads 'the AI made that up' to excuse a fabricated citation in a published paper (not an acceptable defence)

Editorial commentary

Author responsibility for AI use is the principle that human authors retain full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, originality, ethical sourcing, and freedom from plagiarism of all content in a scholarly work, regardless of which portions were drafted, suggested, or generated by an AI tool.

What this requires in practice

Operationally, this means authors must independently verify every factual claim, citation, and statistic an AI tool produced before it appears in the manuscript — the specific failure this guards against is hallucination, a fluent, confident, fabricated output that will not visibly announce itself as false. It also means ensuring AI-generated text does not constitute plagiarism of the model’s training data (AI-generated prose can closely reproduce phrasing from sources in its training set without attribution), and disclosing the AI use itself (see AI tool disclosure). An author cannot shift blame to the AI tool for an error that ends up in the published record — the accountability sits with the named human authors, full stop.

Why this is the reason AI cannot be listed as an author

This principle is the direct basis for the separate rule that AI systems cannot appear on the author byline (see AI co-authorship rejection): authorship requires the capacity to be held accountable for the work and to approve the final version, and an AI system, having no legal personhood, cannot bear that responsibility. Author responsibility for AI use is therefore the positive statement of where accountability actually sits, once AI is excluded from the byline.

Sources

ICMJE Recommendations (2023 update); COPE Position Statement, “Authorship and AI Tools” (13 February 2023).

Also known as

Human responsibility for AI output

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Author responsibility (for AI use)"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-responsibility-for-ai-use" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-responsibility-for-ai-use",
  "name": "Author responsibility (for AI use)",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-responsibility-for-ai-use",
  "description": "The principle that human authors retain full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, originality, ethical sourcing, and lack of plagiarism of all content in a scholarly work, regardless of which portions were drafted, suggested, or generated by an AI tool.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/genai-disclosure#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-responsibility-for-ai-use",
  "sameAs": [
    "Human responsibility for AI output"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T01:56:13",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T14:39:25",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.