Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack CProposedv2026.2

Bias audit (model)

A model audit scoped specifically to fairness and discrimination criteria: measuring quantitative fairness metrics and qualitative failure-mode patterns across pre-specified groups, often to satisfy a specific legal requirement.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Bias audit (model)

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    An independent auditor tests an automated hiring-screening tool for equal selection rates across gender and race categories before an employer may use it, per NYC Local Law 144.

  • Is an instance

    A university tests an admissions-support model for calibration parity across applicant demographic groups.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A vendor’s own internal fairness testing, without an independent auditor and without published results, does not satisfy a Local Law 144-style bias-audit requirement, which specifically mandates auditor independence.

Editorial commentary

A bias audit is a model audit scoped specifically to fairness and discrimination criteria rather than the full range of a model audit’s possible scope (performance, robustness, security, privacy). It measures quantitative fairness metrics — equal-opportunity difference, demographic parity, calibration parity, predictive-parity gaps — across pre-specified groups, alongside qualitative failure-mode analysis of how and where errors concentrate.

Why the choice of metric matters

Choosing which fairness metric to audit against is itself an ethically loaded decision, not a neutral technical one. Chouldechova’s impossibility results show that, except in special cases, distinct fairness metrics cannot generally all be satisfied simultaneously by the same model — a system calibrated to equalise false-positive rates across groups will typically not also equalise predictive parity. A credible bias audit states, in advance, which fairness definition it is measuring against and why, rather than reporting whichever metric happens to look favourable.

Regulatory anchor: NYC Local Law 144

New York City’s Local Law 144 (effective 2023) requires employers using an ‘automated employment decision tool’ to have it bias-audited by an independent auditor — not the vendor itself — within one year before use, to publish a summary of the audit results, and to notify candidates that such a tool is in use. Several other US states have since introduced comparable requirements. This is the clearest example of bias-audit obligations moving from voluntary best practice into binding law, and it specifically requires independence: an audit performed by the tool’s own developer does not satisfy the law’s intent.

Relationship to model audit — these stay distinct terms

A general model audit can cover fairness alongside performance, security and robustness in one exercise; a bias audit is the narrower case where fairness is the entire scope, often because a specific law or policy (like Local Law 144) mandates exactly that scope and nothing broader. The two terms are not redundant: ‘model audit’ is the umbrella independent-verification concept, and ‘bias audit’ names the fairness-specific instance of it that increasingly carries its own distinct legal requirements.

References

  • Buolamwini, Gebru, ‘Gender Shades’ (FAccT, 2018); Chouldechova, ‘Fair prediction with disparate impact’ (Big Data, 2017); NYC Local Law 144 (2021, effective 2023).

Also known as

fairness audit · algorithmic bias audit

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Bias audit (model)"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/bias-audit-model" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/bias-audit-model",
  "name": "Bias audit (model)",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/bias-audit-model",
  "description": "A model audit scoped specifically to fairness and discrimination criteria: measuring quantitative fairness metrics and qualitative failure-mode patterns across pre-specified groups, often to satisfy a specific legal requirement.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/ai-ml-research-outputs#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/bias-audit-model",
  "sameAs": [
    "fairness audit",
    "algorithmic bias audit"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:50",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T16:26:23",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.