Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack CStablev2026.2

DMP review

A formal or informal evaluation of a DMP by a peer, data steward, librarian, or funder reviewer against quality criteria such as completeness, plausibility, and policy alignment.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about DMP review

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A research-data librarian providing written comments on a draft DMP before submission.

  • Is an instance

    A funder peer-review panel scoring the DMP section of an application.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    An automated schema validation of a JSON DMP (compliance check, not review).

  • Not an instance

    A spelling check.

Editorial commentary

A DMP review is a qualitative evaluation of a Data Management Plan (DMP) by a peer, data steward, librarian, or funder reviewer, judged against criteria such as completeness, plausibility of the storage and sharing arrangements, appropriateness of the chosen metadata standard, and alignment with funder or institutional policy. It is a human, judgement-based process — a reviewer might comment that a proposed storage estimate looks too low for the described dataset, or that a chosen repository does not actually support the access controls the plan promises.

Many research offices now offer pre-submission DMP review as a standing service: a data librarian or RDM specialist reads a draft plan before it goes into a grant application and returns comments, in much the same way a grants office might review a budget justification. This differs in kind from an automated compliance check, which can only confirm structural requirements are present, not whether the plan’s judgement calls are sound — the two are complementary, and an institutional review process commonly runs both.

How it differs from adjacent DMP concepts

  • vs. DMP compliance check — a compliance check is automated and structural (does the plan name a repository); a review is qualitative and judgement-based (is that repository the right choice).
  • vs. DMP assessment — an assessment applies a published rubric to produce a comparable score across many plans; a review is typically free-text feedback on one specific plan and does not aim for comparability.

References

  • Digital Curation Centre, “How to Develop a Data Management and Sharing Plan,” DMP review guidance.

Also known as

DMP feedback · DMP critique

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="DMP review"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/dmp-review" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/dmp-review",
  "name": "DMP review",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/dmp-review",
  "description": "A formal or informal evaluation of a DMP by a peer, data steward, librarian, or funder reviewer against quality criteria such as completeness, plausibility, and policy alignment.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/machine-actionable-dmps#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/dmp-review",
  "sameAs": [
    "DMP feedback",
    "DMP critique"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:48",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T14:11:31",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.