Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AStablev2026.2

Generative-AI disclosure statement

A dedicated section in a manuscript — typically headed 'Use of Generative AI' or similar — that consolidates all disclosures of AI tool use across the work, including tools used, versions, sections affected, and the human authors' verification process.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Generative-AI disclosure statement

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A paragraph headed 'Use of Generative AI' stating tools, scope, and human review

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A single sentence in the acknowledgements saying 'thanks to ChatGPT for help' fails as a disclosure statement

Editorial commentary

A generative-AI disclosure statement is a dedicated section in a manuscript — typically headed “Use of Generative AI” or similar — that consolidates all disclosures of AI tool use across the work: which tools, which versions, which sections were affected, and how the human authors verified the output, in one fixed, findable location rather than scattered through the methods section.

Why publishers moved to a fixed section

The convention parallels two other now-standard fixed-location statements: conflict-of-interest disclosures and funding statements. Placing AI-use disclosure in its own labelled section — rather than leaving it to authors to mention wherever seemed natural — means readers, editors, and reviewers can locate it without reading the full text, and means editorial checks for the presence of a disclosure can be automated or at least mechanically verified. This is now the dominant format at major publishers rather than a stylistic option.

How this differs from AI tool disclosure

The disclosure statement is a structural and placement convention — a fixed section. AI tool disclosure is the substantive content requirement that goes inside it — naming the tool, version, purpose, and locus of use. A journal can require the statement (the section must exist) and separately specify what counts as adequate disclosure within it (the content standard); satisfying one does not automatically satisfy the other.

Sources

Elsevier Generative AI Policies (2023); Springer Nature AI authorship policy; ICMJE Recommendations (2023 update).

Also known as

GenAI use statement · AI disclosure section

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Generative-AI disclosure statement"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/generative-ai-disclosure-statement" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/generative-ai-disclosure-statement",
  "name": "Generative-AI disclosure statement",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/generative-ai-disclosure-statement",
  "description": "A dedicated section in a manuscript — typically headed 'Use of Generative AI' or similar — that consolidates all disclosures of AI tool use across the work, including tools used, versions, sections affected, and the human authors' verification process.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/genai-disclosure#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/generative-ai-disclosure-statement",
  "sameAs": [
    "GenAI use statement",
    "AI disclosure section"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T01:56:27",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T14:39:23",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.