Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EProposedv2026.2

Knowledge translation (KT)

The process of moving research knowledge into use -- synthesising, disseminating, exchanging and applying it -- to improve outcomes and strengthen practice or policy, anchored in CIHR's framework distinguishing end-of-grant KT from integrated KT.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Knowledge translation (KT)

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A research team disseminates findings via tailored briefings to clinicians and policymakers after a study concludes (end-of-grant KT).

  • Is an instance

    A research team includes frontline clinicians as co-investigators from the outset, shaping the study to fit real practice constraints (integrated KT).

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Simply publishing a paper in an academic journal, with no tailoring or active outreach to the practitioners or policymakers who might use it, is not knowledge translation in the CIHR sense -- KT requires deliberate synthesis and exchange aimed at use.

Editorial commentary

Knowledge translation (KT) is the process of moving research knowledge into use — synthesising, disseminating, exchanging, and applying it, in an ethically sound way, to improve outcomes and strengthen practice or policy. The term is most fully developed in health research, and above all in Canada, where the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) built and popularised the framework that now anchors most usage of the term internationally.

End-of-grant KT versus integrated KT

CIHR distinguishes two modes. End-of-grant KT is dissemination after the research is complete — publishing findings, presenting them to relevant audiences, tailoring messages for specific knowledge users. Integrated KT (IKT) instead brings the intended users of the research — clinicians, policymakers, patient groups — in as partners throughout the research process itself, from question-framing onward, on the reasoning that knowledge co-produced with its eventual users is more likely to actually get used than knowledge handed to them afterward. IKT overlaps substantially with what patient and public involvement calls involvement, applied specifically to the knowledge-use stage of the research cycle rather than to study design alone.

The Knowledge-to-Action framework

Graham et al.’s Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) framework (2006) is the most widely cited operationalisation of KT: a ‘knowledge creation’ funnel (progressively synthesising and distilling primary research into usable tools and products) feeding into an ‘action’ cycle of identifying the problem, adapting knowledge to the local context, assessing barriers to its use, selecting and implementing interventions, monitoring uptake, evaluating outcomes, and sustaining use over time. The framework is explicitly cyclical and iterative rather than a one-way pipeline from research to practice.

Adjacent terms it is often confused with

KT overlaps with, but is not identical to, implementation science (which studies the methods for promoting uptake of evidence-based practice within specific systems), knowledge mobilisation (a broader, less health-specific term common in Canadian and UK social-science funding contexts), and knowledge exchange (which emphasises the bidirectional flow of knowledge between researchers and users rather than translation in one direction). In practice the terms are used inconsistently across funders and disciplines; CIHR’s KT framework remains the most precisely defined reference point, which is why it anchors this entry.

References

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research, knowledge translation definitions and framework; Graham et al., ‘Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?’ (Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2006).

Also known as

KT · Knowledge transfer

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Knowledge translation (KT)"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-translation" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-translation",
  "name": "Knowledge translation (KT)",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-translation",
  "description": "The process of moving research knowledge into use -- synthesising, disseminating, exchanging and applying it -- to improve outcomes and strengthen practice or policy, anchored in CIHR's framework distinguishing end-of-grant KT from integrated KT.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/engagement-impact-sdg#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-translation",
  "sameAs": [
    "KT",
    "Knowledge transfer"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:57",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T16:26:33",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.