Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack DStablev2026.1

Licence

In scholarly publishing, the legal terms under which a work — an article, dataset, preprint, or other output — may be reused, redistributed, or built upon, typically expressed as a Creative Commons licence attached at the point of publication or deposit.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Licence

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Editorial commentary

On this site, licence means the specific sense used in scholarly publishing: the legal terms under which a published work — an article, a dataset, a preprint, or another research output — may be reused, redistributed, or built upon by someone other than the rights holder. In practice this almost always means a Creative Commons licence attached at the point of publication or deposit, and it is worth stating that scope explicitly because “licence” is a genuinely ambiguous, overloaded word even inside a single university: a software licence agreement, an institutional site licence for journal access, and a publishing licence are three unrelated things that happen to share a name.

What a publishing licence actually grants

A licence in this sense does not usually transfer copyright — the author or their institution typically retains it — but grants specific reuse permissions to the public or to a publisher. The most common vehicle is a Creative Commons licence, built from four elements (Attribution, ShareAlike, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives) combined into six standard variants from most to least permissive: CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC BY-NC, CC BY-NC-SA, CC BY-ND, and CC BY-NC-ND. Many funders now require CC BY specifically as a condition of grant-funded open-access publication (cOAlition S’s Plan S is the clearest example, permitting CC BY-SA or CC0 as alternatives and CC BY-ND only by exception), because it imposes the fewest restrictions on reuse. A related but separate mechanism is a rights retention strategy, under which an author or their institution applies an open licence to their own accepted manuscript independent of whatever licence the publisher’s version of record carries.

What “licence” does not mean here

Three adjacent uses of the word are deliberately out of scope for this term and are covered separately. A software licence agreement governs the terms under which code may be used, modified, or distributed (MIT, GPL, Apache, and similar) — Creative Commons explicitly recommends against applying its standard licences to source code, since they lack the patent and source-code provisions software licensing needs, though CC0 is endorsed for dedicating software to the public domain; see the site’s coverage of open source software licensing in technology transfer for that sense. A university’s institutional or “site” licence with a publisher is a subscription-access contract controlling who can read paywalled content, unrelated to reuse rights on already-open material. And in the UK, general intellectual-property licensing questions (patents, trademarks) are the remit of the Intellectual Property Office (IPO), not a publishing-licence question at all.

Encountering it in a research office

A research office typically deals with publishing licences at two points: advising an author which licence a given funder mandate requires before submission, and checking a signed publishing agreement to confirm the licence it grants actually matches funder policy — a mismatch (for example, a publisher defaulting to CC BY-NC when the funder requires CC BY) is one of the more common compliance gaps caught late, at reporting stage rather than before submission.

References

  • Creative Commons, “About CC Licenses” (creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses).
  • cOAlition S, Plan S / Rights Retention Strategy FAQ (coalition-s.org).

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Licence"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/licence" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/licence",
  "name": "Licence",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/licence",
  "description": "In scholarly publishing, the legal terms under which a work — an article, dataset, preprint, or other output — may be reused, redistributed, or built upon, typically expressed as a Creative Commons licence attached at the point of publication or deposit.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/compliance-regulatory#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/licence",
  "sameAs": [
    "http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/licence"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-19T19:12:17",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T14:11:52",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.