Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack CStablev2026.2

NIH Rigor and Reproducibility policy

The set of US National Institutes of Health policies, effective from 2016, requiring applicants and grantees to address scientific premise, scientific rigour, biological variables (including sex as a biological variable), and authentication of key biological and chemical resources in grant applications.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about NIH Rigor and Reproducibility policy

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    An NIH R01 application addressing sex as a biological variable and providing an authentication plan for the cell lines used.

  • Is an instance

    A progress report attesting to mid-grant compliance with the authentication plan.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    An NSF Data Management Plan (different policy).

  • Not an instance

    A journal reporting standard.

Editorial commentary

The NIH Rigor and Reproducibility policy is the set of US National Institutes of Health policies, effective from 2016, requiring applicants and grantees to address scientific premise, scientific rigour, biological variables (including sex as a biological variable), and authentication of key biological and chemical resources in grant applications. Unlike the other terms in this cluster, it is a funder compliance requirement, not a type or measure of reproducibility itself — it is the policy mechanism NIH uses to make applicants demonstrate attention to the reproducibility problems those other terms describe.

What it requires, concretely

NIH SF424 application instructions require four specific elements across most institutes and centers: a stated scientific premise (the strength of prior data the proposal builds on, and any known weaknesses); a plan for scientific rigour (adequate sample size, appropriate controls, blinding, and statistical approach); explicit consideration of relevant biological variables, most notably sex as a biological variable in vertebrate animal and human studies unless a strong justification for single-sex study is given; and a plan for authentication of key biological and/or chemical resources (cell lines, antibodies, and other reagents whose identity or purity can drift or be mislabelled). These are now built into standard review criteria at the application stage and are followed up in progress reporting, not just requested once.

Why it exists

The policy was NIH’s direct response to a body of preclinical-reproducibility literature — most prominently Begley & Ellis (2012), which reported that Amgen scientists could not replicate the majority of a sample of “landmark” preclinical cancer studies they attempted to build on, and Freedman et al. (2015), which estimated the cumulative cost of irreproducible preclinical research in the US. The policy targets the empirical and methodological weaknesses (underpowered studies, unblinded scoring, unauthenticated cell lines) that literature identified as recurring causes, rather than mandating any specific reproducibility check on the resulting publication.

Sources

NIH Notice NOT-OD-15-103, “Enhancing Reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency”; Begley & Ellis, Nature (2012); Freedman et al., PLOS Biology (2015).

Also known as

NIH R&R policy · NIH Rigor policy

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="NIH Rigor and Reproducibility policy"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/nih-rigor-and-reproducibility-policy" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/nih-rigor-and-reproducibility-policy",
  "name": "NIH Rigor and Reproducibility policy",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/nih-rigor-and-reproducibility-policy",
  "description": "The set of US National Institutes of Health policies, effective from 2016, requiring applicants and grantees to address scientific premise, scientific rigour, biological variables (including sex as a biological variable), and authentication of key biological and chemical resources in grant applications.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/reproducibility#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/nih-rigor-and-reproducibility-policy",
  "sameAs": [
    "NIH R&R policy",
    "NIH Rigor policy"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:50",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T14:39:20",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.