Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack CProposedv2026.2

P-hacking

P-hacking is the practice of exploiting flexibility in data collection, exclusion, or analysis choices — often unconsciously — to steer a result toward statistical significance, undisclosed in the final report as if the reported analysis were the only one that had been tried.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about P-hacking

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    Trying several different outcome definitions, covariate sets, or subgroup splits, then reporting only the combination that reached statistical significance, without disclosing the other analyses that were tried and discarded

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Running one pre-registered analysis exactly as specified in advance, and reporting a null result honestly, is not p-hacking even though the researcher may have hoped for a significant finding — the practice is defined by undisclosed selective reporting, not by the outcome

Editorial commentary

P-hacking is the practice of exploiting flexibility in data collection, exclusion, or analysis choices — sometimes deliberately, more often unconsciously — to steer a result toward statistical significance, without disclosing that other reasonable analytic choices were tried and discarded. It is one of the best-documented questionable research practices and a widely cited contributor to the field’s reproducibility crisis.

How it differs from HARKing

P-hacking and HARKing (Hypothesising After the Results are Known) are related but distinct failure modes: p-hacking is about the analysis — trying multiple statistical approaches until one reaches significance — while HARKing is about the write-up, presenting a post-hoc finding as though it had been the study’s original hypothesis all along. The two often occur together but are separable practices with separate defences. See P-hacking vs HARKing for a direct comparison.

Why it is hard to detect from a single paper

Because the undisclosed alternative analyses never appear in the published report, p-hacking is usually invisible in any one paper. It is instead detected at the literature level: an unusual excess of reported p-values clustered just under the 0.05 significance threshold across many published studies is a documented statistical signature (the “p-curve” method), and discrepancies between a study’s pre-registered analysis plan and what was actually reported are a direct, paper-level red flag.

How journals and funders respond

The principal structural defence is pre-registration of hypotheses and analysis plans before data collection or analysis begins, which removes the researcher’s ability to select an analysis after seeing the results. Registered Reports go further, having a journal peer-review and provisionally accept the study design and analysis plan before results exist at all, removing any incentive to p-hack toward a publishable outcome. Many journals now also require a statistical analysis plan or disclosure of all analyses conducted, not only those reported.

References

  • Simmons, Nelson, Simonsohn, ‘False-positive psychology’ (Psychological Science, 2011); Simonsohn, Nelson, Simmons, ‘P-curve’ (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2014).

Also known as

p-fishing · significance chasing

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="P-hacking"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/p-hacking" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/p-hacking",
  "name": "P-hacking",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/p-hacking",
  "description": "P-hacking is the practice of exploiting flexibility in data collection, exclusion, or analysis choices — often unconsciously — to steer a result toward statistical significance, undisclosed in the final report as if the reported analysis were the only one that had been tried.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/reproducibility#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/p-hacking",
  "sameAs": [
    "p-fishing",
    "significance chasing"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:50",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:39:33",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.