Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
A researcher submits a competing renewal for their R01 after the original 5-year period and is funded for a further 5 years.
- Is an instance
A Wellcome Investigator successfully renews their award for a second quinquennium.
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
A one-off start-up grant with no renewal pathway is not renewable.
- Not an instance
A grant whose duration is fixed and not extendable is not renewable.
Editorial commentary
A renewable award is not itself an extra installment of funding — it is a property of the grant mechanism: whether its terms allow the current award holder to compete for a further period of support once the existing project period ends. Renewal is always competitive; it is never automatic.
Renewal is a mechanism eligibility, not a routine release
This is the point most often confused with continuation award. A continuation award (NIH Type 5) is the routine, non-peer-reviewed release of the next budget period’s funding within an award’s already-approved project period. A competing renewal (NIH Type 2) is a request for support beyond the current project period — it must be developed and reviewed exactly as if it were a first-time application, and it competes directly against genuinely new (Type 1) applications for the same pool of funding. Renewability describes whether that Type 2 path exists at all for a given mechanism; continuation happens automatically (subject to satisfactory progress) within a project period regardless of whether the mechanism is renewable.
Not every mechanism supports renewal
Renewal availability is mechanism-specific. NIH’s R01 supports a Type 2 competing renewal. The R21 Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant explicitly does not: once an R21 project period ends, there is no renewal path, and further work requires a new Type 1 application under whatever mechanism fits the next stage of the science.
What a competing renewal application must do
A competing renewal cannot simply summarize prior progress and request more time — it must present a full research plan, undergo full scientific peer review, and be judged on scientific merit against the current pool of applicants, including entirely new investigators.
Non-US example
Wellcome Investigator Awards illustrate the same principle outside NIH: a successful award holder can apply to renew for a second term (commonly referred to as a further quinquennium), but that application is separately assessed on its own merits rather than issued automatically.
Also known as
Competing renewal · Renewable grant
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="Renewable award"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/renewable-award" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/renewable-award",
"name": "Renewable award",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/renewable-award",
"description": "A grant mechanism whose terms allow the recipient to submit a new, fully peer-reviewed competing application -- a competing renewal -- for a further period of support once the current project period ends, competing on equal footing with new applications. NIH designates this a Type 2 application; it is distinct from the routine, non-competing continuation awards issued within an already-approved project period.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/funding-finance#set",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/renewable-award",
"sameAs": [
"Competing renewal",
"Renewable grant"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"publisher": {
"@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
},
"author": {
"@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
},
"datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:58",
"dateModified": "2026-08-22T16:26:56",
"inLanguage": "en-GB",
"isAccessibleForFree": true
}
