Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack DProposedv2026.2

Salami slicing

Salami slicing (salami publication) is dividing the results of a single coherent study or dataset into multiple separately submitted papers, each too fragmentary to represent the work fully, without disclosing the relationship to editors or readers.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Salami slicing

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A single 200-participant cohort study published as four papers (one per outcome variable), none of which cross-reference the others.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A baseline-cohort descriptive paper followed by an intervention-trial paper using the same recruitment infrastructure, with each paper citing the other.

Editorial commentary

Salami slicing (also called salami publication or data fragmentation) is the practice of dividing the results of one coherent study, dataset, or research question into multiple separate papers, each reporting only a partial, “least publishable unit” of the work, without disclosing the relationship to editors, reviewers, or readers. The operational test is not the number of papers a project produces but whether each individual paper could stand as a complete, honest account of the question it claims to answer, and whether any overlap with sibling papers (same sample, same cohort, same primary dataset) is disclosed and cross-referenced.

What it is not

Salami slicing is frequently confused with duplicate publication, but the two are structurally different problems. Duplicate publication republishes substantially the same results as if they were new. Salami slicing does the opposite: it splits new, non-overlapping results from one underlying study across several papers, undisclosed. Salami slicing is also distinct from a legitimate multi-paper research program: a large multi-site trial that pre-specifies a primary-outcome paper and several secondary-outcome papers, or a longitudinal study that publishes distinct, genuinely separable analyses over time, is not salami slicing when each paper addresses a different question, adds independent value, and cross-references the related papers openly.

Why it matters

Fragmenting one dataset across undisclosed papers degrades the literature in concrete ways: it can bias meta-analyses when the same participants or samples are counted more than once without cross-reference, it inflates a researcher’s individual publication count relative to the actual contribution, and it forces reviewers and readers to evaluate incomplete slices of a study without the full picture. Editors increasingly ask authors, at submission, to declare any closely related manuscripts that are in press, under review, or recently published from the same dataset, precisely to catch undisclosed fragmentation before publication rather than after.

In practice

Research offices and authors can manage this risk by deciding, before submission, whether a body of work is genuinely separable into distinct research questions, and by disclosing overlapping samples or datasets to every journal involved regardless of outcome. Confirmed cases are usually addressed with a correction, an editorial note explaining the overlap, or in more serious or repeated instances a formal COPE-guided investigation; deliberate, undisclosed fragmentation intended to inflate output can be treated as a breach of publication ethics by an institution even where it does not meet a narrower legal definition of research misconduct.

Related terms

See also questionable research practices, research misconduct, and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.

References

  • COPE Discussion Document: Salami Publication (2020)
  • ICMJE Recommendations (current edition)

Also known as

salami publication · least publishable unit · LPU

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Salami slicing"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/salami-slicing" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/salami-slicing",
  "name": "Salami slicing",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/salami-slicing",
  "description": "Salami slicing (salami publication) is dividing the results of a single coherent study or dataset into multiple separately submitted papers, each too fragmentary to represent the work fully, without disclosing the relationship to editors or readers.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-integrity#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/salami-slicing",
  "sameAs": [
    "salami publication",
    "least publishable unit",
    "LPU"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:52",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:52:03",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.