Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AProposedv2026.2

Scoping review

A literature review that maps the breadth and nature of evidence on a broad topic — characterising what exists, where, and in what form — using systematic search methods but without typically appraising study quality or synthesising effect estimates, following PRISMA-ScR.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Scoping review

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A scoping review mapping all qualitative studies on AI use in radiology workflows over 2018-2024

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A focused systematic review of one intervention's effects is not a scoping review (it is a systematic review)

Editorial commentary

A scoping review maps the breadth and nature of the evidence on a broad topic — characterising what exists, where it was published, and in what form — using systematic search methods, but without typically appraising individual study quality or attempting to synthesise effect estimates. It follows PRISMA-ScR (the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews), which uses a PCC (Population, Concept, Context) framing rather than the PICO framing common in systematic reviews of interventions.

How this differs from a systematic review

The two answer structurally different questions: a scoping review answers “what evidence exists on this topic, and where?”, while a systematic review answers a focused question such as “does this intervention work?” and involves formal appraisal of study quality that a scoping review typically omits. Scoping reviews are frequently conducted as a precursor step, to determine whether a full systematic review is feasible and worthwhile, or as a standalone output when the underlying question is genuinely descriptive rather than evaluative. Notably, PROSPERO — the prospective register most systematic reviews use — explicitly excludes scoping reviews from eligibility for registration, regardless of topic.

Example

A scoping review mapping the qualitative literature on a given technology’s use within a specific clinical or research workflow across a defined date range, cataloguing study designs and settings without pooling any outcomes.

Also known as

Scoping study · Evidence map

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Scoping review"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review",
  "name": "Scoping review",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review",
  "description": "A literature review that maps the breadth and nature of evidence on a broad topic — characterising what exists, where, and in what form — using systematic search methods but without typically appraising study quality or synthesising effect estimates, following PRISMA-ScR.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-outputs#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/scoping-review",
  "sameAs": [
    "Scoping study",
    "Evidence map"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:05:51",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:29:16",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.