Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack DProposedv2026.2

Sensitive technology

Sensitive technology is research-security shorthand for a field a national government has formally flagged as warranting extra scrutiny of who is involved in it and how its outputs and collaborations are managed. The specific areas named vary by jurisdiction and change over time, but recurring categories include advanced semiconductors, quantum information science, advanced biotechnology, advanced materials, hypersonics, and certain artificial-intelligence applications. National authorities in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia each maintain their own published list or fr

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 23 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Sensitive technology

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A proposal involving quantum sensing for navigation triggers an institutional sensitive technology review.

  • Is an instance

    A graduate student's project involving advanced biotechnology is flagged for due diligence on foreign affiliations of collaborators.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A study of historical literature is not subject to sensitive technology review.

  • Not an instance

    Standard mathematics research with no immediate application typically falls outside sensitive technology designations.

Editorial commentary

Sensitive technology is research-security shorthand for a field a national government has formally flagged as warranting extra scrutiny of who is involved in it and how its outputs and collaborations are managed. The specific areas named vary by jurisdiction and change over time, but recurring categories include advanced semiconductors, quantum information science, advanced biotechnology, advanced materials, hypersonics, and certain artificial-intelligence applications. National authorities in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia each maintain their own published list or framework, used to inform research-security review, export control determinations, and visa or personnel screening.

Designation triggers review, not a ban

Being on a sensitive-technology list does not, by itself, mean the research cannot be done or the collaboration cannot proceed. It triggers a risk-assessment process — who is involved, what is being shared with whom, whether foreign-government-affiliated funding or personnel are part of the picture — and, where a specific legal control actually applies (export control, an investment-screening regime, a funding-eligibility restriction), the controls that follow from that determination. Conflating "sensitive" with "prohibited" is one of the more common errors institutions make when first building a research-security review process.

How this relates to CASRAI’s other research-security terms

Sensitive-technology designation is one of several distinct triggers a research-security review has to check for, alongside NSPM-33‘s disclosure requirements (which apply based on funding source and personnel, regardless of technology area), foreign component disclosure (which turns on where work is performed, not what it’s about), and export-controlled research generally (which turns on the specific item or technical data involved, assessed against a control list). A project can trigger one of these without triggering the others — they are checked separately, not as a single combined test.

Check current lists directly

Because the specific items on a sensitive-technology list, and the legal consequences of appearing on it, change and carry real compliance weight, a research office should verify current list content directly against the issuing government’s own current publication for the specific jurisdiction and award, rather than relying on a general secondary description — including this one.

References

Also known as

sensitive technology area · STA · critical technology

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Sensitive technology"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/sensitive-technology" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/sensitive-technology",
  "name": "Sensitive technology",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/sensitive-technology",
  "description": "Sensitive technology is research-security shorthand for a field a national government has formally flagged as warranting extra scrutiny of who is involved in it and how its outputs and collaborations are managed. The specific areas named vary by jurisdiction and change over time, but recurring categories include advanced semiconductors, quantum information science, advanced biotechnology, advanced materials, hypersonics, and certain artificial-intelligence applications. National authorities in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia each maintain their own published list or fr",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-security#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/sensitive-technology",
  "sameAs": [
    "sensitive technology area",
    "STA",
    "critical technology"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:53",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-23T04:57:45",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.