Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AProposedv2026.2

Stage-2 results paper

The completed registered report submitted after data collection, containing the results, discussion, and any exploratory (clearly labelled) analyses beyond the pre-registered plan, peer-reviewed only for adherence to the Stage 1 protocol and quality of conclusions — not for the direction of findings.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Stage-2 results paper

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A Stage 2 publication reporting a null effect, accepted because the Stage 1 protocol was followed

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A paper that was not preceded by Stage 1 acceptance is not a Stage 2 results paper, regardless of its quality

Editorial commentary

A Stage-2 results paper is the completed manuscript submitted after data collection under a Registered Reports arrangement — containing the actual results, discussion, and any exploratory analyses that go beyond the pre-registered plan, clearly labelled as exploratory rather than confirmatory. Its peer review is deliberately narrow: reviewers check adherence to the accepted Stage 1 protocol and the soundness of the conclusions drawn — not whether the results themselves are positive, novel, or statistically significant. A Stage 2 paper cannot legitimately be rejected because its findings were null or unexpected, since the in-principle acceptance granted at Stage 1 is a binding commitment.

How this differs from Stage 1 and from ordinary results papers

Unlike a conventional results paper, a Stage 2 submission’s acceptance was already substantially decided before the data existed — the Stage 1 review is where the scientific gatekeeping happened. Deviations from the registered Stage 1 plan must be transparently disclosed, and any additional analyses not specified in advance must be clearly flagged as exploratory so readers can distinguish confirmatory from post-hoc findings.

Example

A Stage 2 publication reporting a statistically null primary result, accepted for publication because the accepted Stage 1 protocol was followed faithfully — a direct structural counter-measure to publication bias against null findings.

Also known as

Stage 2 RR · RR Stage 2

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Stage-2 results paper"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper",
  "name": "Stage-2 results paper",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper",
  "description": "The completed registered report submitted after data collection, containing the results, discussion, and any exploratory (clearly labelled) analyses beyond the pre-registered plan, peer-reviewed only for adherence to the Stage 1 protocol and quality of conclusions — not for the direction of findings.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-outputs#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/stage-2-results-paper",
  "sameAs": [
    "Stage 2 RR",
    "RR Stage 2"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:04:23",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:29:12",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.