Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EProposedv2026.2

Subaward

A subaward is the funding instrument — not the organization, not the oversight activity — by which a pass-through entity transfers part of a prime award 's funding and a defined, substantive scope of research work to a subrecipient. A subrecipient carries out programmatic work under its own principal investigator and budget and is judged, at least in part, against the subaward's own performance measures — unlike a contractor, which simply provides goods or services within a market relationship. 2 CFR 200.331 sets out the factors used to make that subrecipient-vs-contractor de

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 23 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Subaward

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A prime NIH R01 includes a $250,000 subaward to a partner university for the data-analysis aim, with quarterly reporting to the prime.

  • Is an instance

    A Horizon Europe consortium beneficiary issues a third-party financial contribution agreement (functionally similar to a subaward) to a linked third party.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A purchase order for reagents is not a subaward.

  • Not an instance

    A consulting contract for a single advisory task is not a subaward.

Editorial commentary

A subaward is the funding instrument — not the organization, not the oversight activity — by which a pass-through entity transfers part of a prime award‘s funding and a defined, substantive scope of research work to a subrecipient. A subrecipient carries out programmatic work under its own principal investigator and budget and is judged, at least in part, against the subaward’s own performance measures — unlike a contractor, which simply provides goods or services within a market relationship. 2 CFR 200.331 sets out the factors used to make that subrecipient-vs-contractor determination when the answer isn’t obvious from the relationship’s substance.

Four related terms, four vantage points

These describe the same relationship from different angles, and are deliberately kept as separate entries rather than merged, because a research office uses each one to answer a different question: subaward is the instrument itself (what was agreed, and its terms); prime award is the original funding relationship between the sponsor and the lead recipient that the subaward flows from; pass-through entity is the organizational role of the recipient passing funds onward; subrecipient monitoring is the ongoing oversight practice — risk assessment, financial review, audit follow-up — the pass-through entity is responsible for once the subaward is in place.

MTDC treatment

Under 2 CFR 200.1, up to the first $50,000 of each subaward is included in the prime recipient’s Modified Total Direct Cost base; the portion of a subaward above $50,000 is excluded from MTDC, meaning the prime’s negotiated indirect-cost rate does not apply to that excess. This is the single most common source of a subaward budget error — applying F&A to the full subaward amount rather than just the first $50,000.

What a subaward agreement typically contains

Scope of work, budget and payment terms, key personnel, reporting and deliverable requirements, and the "flow-down" terms the prime award itself imposes (e.g., data-sharing, publication, or reporting obligations that must pass through to the subrecipient). The Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) maintains standard subaward templates widely used across US research institutions to speed negotiation between frequent collaborators.

References

  • 2 CFR 200.1 (MTDC definition, $50,000 subaward exclusion); 2 CFR 200.331-200.333 (subaward requirements, risk assessment, monitoring); Federal Demonstration Partnership subaward templates.

Also known as

Subgrant · Subcontract (in research) · Subaward agreement

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Subaward"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/subaward" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/subaward",
  "name": "Subaward",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/subaward",
  "description": "A subaward is the funding instrument — not the organization, not the oversight activity — by which a pass-through entity transfers part of a prime award 's funding and a defined, substantive scope of research work to a subrecipient. A subrecipient carries out programmatic work under its own principal investigator and budget and is judged, at least in part, against the subaward's own performance measures — unlike a contractor, which simply provides goods or services within a market relationship. 2 CFR 200.331 sets out the factors used to make that subrecipient-vs-contractor de",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/funding-finance#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/subaward",
  "sameAs": [
    "Subgrant",
    "Subcontract (in research)",
    "Subaward agreement"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:59",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-23T04:56:59",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.