Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AStablev2026.2

Working paper

A scholarly document circulated through an institutional working-paper series (such as NBER, IZA, or CEPR), an academic website, or a repository, presenting research in progress for community feedback prior to — or sometimes instead of — formal peer review and journal publication. The defining feature is dissemination through an established institutional series with its own numbering and identity, distinct from a one-off self-posted draft.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Working paper

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper cited and discussed in policy debates years before (or in place of) eventual journal publication.

  • Is an instance

    An IZA Institute of Labor Economics discussion/working paper circulated to the labour-economics community for comment while the underlying research is still being refined.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A peer-reviewed, published journal article is not a working paper, even if an earlier working-paper version of the same research still circulates.

  • Not an instance

    A single-author manuscript self-posted to a personal website with no institutional series, numbering, or vetting is closer to an informal draft or, if posted to a recognised server, a preprint — not a working paper in the institutional-series sense this term describes.

Editorial commentary

A working paper is research circulated in progress through an established institutional series — NBER, IZA, CEPR, and similar bodies run some of the best-known examples — rather than posted informally or held privately until journal submission. The institutional series itself is part of the definition: it gives the paper a stable series number, a citable identity, and (often) light internal vetting, well before formal peer review. Working papers are especially central to economics and the social sciences, where the field’s own publication culture has historically treated the working paper as the primary channel through which research is discussed and cited, with eventual journal publication functioning more as a later certification step than as the paper’s first public appearance.

How it differs from a preprint

A preprint is typically posted to a discipline-wide, open preprint server (arXiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, and similar), is usually explicitly framed as not-yet-peer-reviewed, and is not tied to a specific issuing institution’s own numbered series. A working paper is issued by a specific institution’s own series and is often, by convention, explicitly less polished or more provisional in tone than a preprint of the same underlying research would be — some researchers circulate a working paper first, then post a more finished version as a preprint or submit it to a journal.

How it differs from a discussion paper

A discussion paper exists to argue a position and solicit structured deliberation; a working paper exists to circulate empirical or theoretical research still in progress for general feedback ahead of eventual journal submission. Some institutional series (including some literally titled “Discussion Papers,” such as several central-bank and IZA series) blur this line in their naming, but the functional distinction — position-for-deliberation versus research-in-progress-for-feedback — still holds.

How it differs from a technical report

A technical report documents completed technical work in detail (often with an institutional report number, from a lab, agency, or company) and is not necessarily headed toward journal publication at all; a working paper is explicitly framed as research in progress, most often written with eventual journal submission as the expected endpoint.

References

  • NBER Working Paper Series, nber.org
  • RePEc (Research Papers in Economics), repec.org
  • IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Discussion Paper series

Also known as

Discussion paper (working) · WP

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Working paper"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/working-paper" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/working-paper",
  "name": "Working paper",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/working-paper",
  "description": "A scholarly document circulated through an institutional working-paper series (such as NBER, IZA, or CEPR), an academic website, or a repository, presenting research in progress for community feedback prior to — or sometimes instead of — formal peer review and journal publication. The defining feature is dissemination through an established institutional series with its own numbering and identity, distinct from a one-off self-posted draft.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-outputs#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/working-paper",
  "sameAs": [
    "Discussion paper (working)",
    "WP"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:07:00",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T12:16:39",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.