Direct comparison
arXiv vs. bioRxiv: Which Preprint Server to Use
arXiv (physics/math/CS, since 1991) has lighter screening; bioRxiv (biology, since 2013) screens harder for biomedical risk. Scope and governance compared.
Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar
Ask about arXiv vs. bioRxiv: Which Preprint Server to Use
Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.
150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.
Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.
How do arXiv, bioRxiv compare side by side?
The table below compares arXiv, bioRxiv across 9 procurement-relevant dimensions, from founded through cost to author.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | arXiv | bioRxiv |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1991, by physicist Paul Ginsparg | 2013, by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) |
| Subject scope | Physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, EE/systems science, economics (8 subject areas) | Biology only (molecular biology, genetics, genomics, neuroscience, ecology, evolutionary biology); clinical/health work goes to sister server medRxiv |
| Operated by | arXiv, Inc., an independent nonprofit since July 1, 2026 (previously hosted by Cornell University; still based at Cornell Tech) | openRxiv, an independent non-profit since March 11, 2025 (previously operated directly by CSHL) |
| Pre-posting screening | Category moderators (working scientists); first-time submitters to a category generally need endorsement from an existing author in that category | Working-scientist moderators screen for plagiarism, non-scientific content, and biosecurity/dual-use or health-risk concerns; no endorsement system |
| Peer reviewed? | No -- screening checks scope/appropriateness, not correctness | No -- screening checks scope/appropriateness and biosecurity risk, not correctness |
| Corpus size | 3M+ articles | Smaller, younger corpus; substantial preprint-adoption growth in biology since founding, accelerated by COVID-19 |
| Funding / governance | Board of Directors; funded by Simons Foundation, Schmidt Sciences, Cornell University, member institutions, donors | Governed by openRxiv, which also operates medRxiv |
| DOI assigned | Yes | Yes |
| Cost to author | Free | Free |
Common questions
Common questions about arXiv vs bioRxiv
Is arXiv or bioRxiv peer reviewed?
+
Neither. Both are preprint servers hosting non-peer-reviewed manuscript versions, screened for scope and scientific character (and, for bioRxiv, biosecurity/ethics risk) but not for correctness. Peer review happens afterward, if at all, at a journal the author separately submits to.
Do I need an endorsement to post to bioRxiv the way I do for arXiv?
+
No. bioRxiv does not use arXiv's endorsement system; it relies on its own moderator screening of each submission rather than requiring an existing author to vouch for a first-time submitter.
Can the same paper go on both arXiv and bioRxiv?
+
In practice authors choose the server matching their field rather than cross-posting the same manuscript to both, since each is scoped to a different subject area and funders/journals generally expect one canonical preprint record.
Who runs arXiv and bioRxiv now?
+
As of July 1, 2026, arXiv is operated by arXiv, Inc., an independent nonprofit that spun out of Cornell University. bioRxiv (and medRxiv) has been operated by the independent non-profit openRxiv since March 11, 2025, taking over from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
