Direct comparison
bioRxiv vs. medRxiv Compared
bioRxiv (life sciences, 2013) vs. medRxiv (clinical/health research, 2019, ICMJE-aligned screening, no case reports) -- both now run by openRxiv.
Written and maintained by CASRAI Editorial Board
Last updated
Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar
Ask about bioRxiv vs. medRxiv Compared
Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.
150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.
Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.
How do bioRxiv, medRxiv compare side by side?
The table below compares bioRxiv, medRxiv across 14 procurement-relevant dimensions, from scope through links forward to journal version.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | bioRxiv | medRxiv |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Life sciences: molecular biology, genetics, neuroscience, ecology, and related basic/preclinical research | Clinical and health research: trials, epidemiology, cohort studies, public-health research |
| Launched | November 2013 | June 2019 |
| Founded/managed by | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) | CSHL, Yale University School of Medicine, and BMJ |
| Current operator | openRxiv (independent non-profit, since March 11, 2025) | openRxiv (independent non-profit, since March 11, 2025) |
| Peer reviewed? | No -- basic screening only, explicitly labelled as such | No -- basic screening only, explicitly labelled as such |
| Screening rigor | Screens for offensive/non-scientific content, plagiarism, and biosecurity/dual-use risk | Goes further than bioRxiv: also screens for content that could endanger patient or public health |
| Case reports / case series | Not categorically excluded (subject to general scope) | Explicitly excluded |
| Other excluded content | Determined by basic scientific scope and screening criteria | Preclinical/veterinary studies, narrative reviews, editorials/opinion pieces, hypotheses without data, standalone guidelines/policy statements/protocols |
| Ethics/IRB documentation | Required where applicable to the study | Required: statement of oversight by an IRB, Ethics Committee, or equivalent for human-subjects research |
| Clinical trial registration | Not applicable to most bioRxiv content | Required: ICMJE-recognized trial registry ID for clinical trials |
| Causal-language guidance | No equivalent explicit guidance | Authors cautioned against causal language absent a robust causal-inference framework; may be declined |
| Licensing at submission | Author choice, including CC licences | Author choice, including CC licences |
| DOI assigned | Yes, with versioned revisions | Yes, with versioned revisions |
| Links forward to journal version | Yes, where the paper is subsequently published | Yes, where the paper is subsequently published |
Common questions
Common questions about bioRxiv vs medRxiv
Can the same manuscript be posted to both bioRxiv and medRxiv?
+
No -- a given manuscript belongs on one or the other based on its content. Basic/preclinical life-sciences work goes to bioRxiv; clinical and human-health research goes to medRxiv. Both servers' screening teams will redirect a manuscript submitted to the wrong one rather than simply rejecting it.
Why does medRxiv exclude case reports?
+
Case reports carry a higher risk of being misread as clinical guidance from a single, unreplicated observation. medRxiv's screening standard specifically weighs public-harm risk, which bioRxiv's broader life-sciences scope does not need to weigh the same way.
Are bioRxiv and medRxiv still run by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory?
+
Not directly as of March 11, 2025. Both are now operated by openRxiv, an independent non-profit created specifically to run them; CSHL and, for medRxiv, Yale and BMJ remain part of the platforms' history and governance lineage.
Does posting on medRxiv prevent later journal publication?
+
No. Most journals that accept preprints treat medRxiv postings the same as bioRxiv postings -- posting first does not preclude submitting to a journal afterward, and the preprint record links forward to the published version once one exists.
Going deeper
