Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
A publisher automatically waives APCs for corresponding authors based in Research4Life countries.
- Is an instance
A funder pays APCs on behalf of grantees and publishes annual statistics on waiver-grant rates.
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
A publisher's waiver policy described as 'available on request' with a granted rate of less than 10%.
- Not an instance
An institutional OA fund that disproportionately supports researchers in well-funded disciplines.
Editorial commentary
APC-based open access has been criticised for shifting paywalls from readers to authors, advantaging researchers at well-funded institutions and disadvantaging those in less-resourced settings, particularly in the Global South. Author fee equity asks publishers and funders to provide: automatic waivers for authors from low- and middle-income countries; transparent waiver-grant rates; institutional waiver programmes; consortium-level pure publish agreements that remove individual author burden; and active investment in diamond OA alternatives that avoid APCs entirely.
How waiver eligibility is usually structured
Most publisher waiver policies key eligibility to the Research4Life country list, which groups countries by income level (typically a Group A tier receiving full waivers and a Group B tier receiving a reduced rate), based on the corresponding author’s institutional affiliation rather than nationality or funding source. This makes the Research4Life list the practical reference point for author fee equity, even though it was originally built for library-access programmes rather than APC waivers.
Price transparency as an equity mechanism
Plan S’s Price Transparency Framework requires participating publishers to itemise what an APC actually covers — editorial handling, production, platform and archiving costs, and margin — rather than quote a single opaque figure. The equity argument is that opaque, non-comparable pricing makes it harder for funders and consortia to negotiate waiver terms or challenge unjustified fee increases, so transparency is treated as a precondition for equity, not a separate goal.
Where this connects on CASRAI
See institutional waiver programme for how individual publishers and institutions operationalise waivers, APC reimbursement (funder) for the funder-side mechanism, and diamond OA for the model that removes the author-fee question entirely.
References
- Research4Life. Plan S Price Transparency Framework. STM Association ‘Transparent and FAIR pricing’ 2022.
Also known as
APC equity · Author-side fee equity
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="Author Fee Equity in OA"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-fee-equity" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-fee-equity",
"name": "Author Fee Equity in OA",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-fee-equity",
"description": "The principle that author-side publication charges (APCs, page charges, submission fees) should not act as a barrier to publication, with equitable access ensured through waivers, transformative agreements, diamond OA alternatives or funder support.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/knowledge-equity#set",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/author-fee-equity",
"sameAs": [
"APC equity",
"Author-side fee equity"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"publisher": {
"@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
},
"author": {
"@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
},
"datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:56",
"dateModified": "2026-08-23T05:13:57",
"inLanguage": "en-GB",
"isAccessibleForFree": true
}
