Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AStablev2026.2

Citizen-scientist contribution

Substantive contribution to research by members of the public participating as volunteers in data collection, classification, observation, analysis, or interpretation, distinct from being a study subject and distinct from professional research staff.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Citizen-scientist contribution

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    The Galaxy Zoo project crediting its top classifiers as authors on a discovery paper

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A passive user of a fitness-tracking app whose data is analysed is a data subject, not a citizen-scientist contributor

Editorial commentary

Citizen scientist contribution is substantive research work performed by members of the public volunteering in data collection, classification, observation, or analysis — ranging from a single data point submitted to a platform like Zooniverse, to sustained, expert-level engagement from a project’s most active volunteers. It is distinct from being a study subject: a citizen scientist actively does research work, rather than being observed or measured by it.

How it differs from related terms: Unlike a patient partner, whose contribution is usually about shaping research design and interpretation from lived experience, a citizen scientist’s contribution is typically the research labour itself — observing, classifying, or collecting. Both differ from Indigenous knowledge holder contribution, which involves community-governed traditional or ecological knowledge rather than crowdsourced task participation.

Credit conventions scale with engagement: collective acknowledgement of “the project’s volunteer contributors” for one-off participants, individually named credit for top contributors, and co-authorship for volunteers whose sustained work meets authorship criteria — as with citizen-science projects that have listed their most active classifiers as named authors on discovery papers.

References

  • European Citizen Science Association (ECSA) Ten Principles of Citizen Science (2015)
  • Bonney et al., “Next Steps for Citizen Science,” Science (2014)

Also known as

Crowd science contribution · Volunteer researcher contribution

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Citizen-scientist contribution"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/citizen-scientist-contribution" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/citizen-scientist-contribution",
  "name": "Citizen-scientist contribution",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/citizen-scientist-contribution",
  "description": "Substantive contribution to research by members of the public participating as volunteers in data collection, classification, observation, analysis, or interpretation, distinct from being a study subject and distinct from professional research staff.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/credit-extensions#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/citizen-scientist-contribution",
  "sameAs": [
    "Crowd science contribution",
    "Volunteer researcher contribution"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T01:59:29",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:04:52",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.