Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack AStablev2026.2

Indigenous-knowledge holder contribution

Substantive contribution to research from Indigenous knowledge keepers, elders, or community members who hold and share traditional knowledge, ecological observations, language, or cultural expertise relevant to the research, in accordance with CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Indigenous-knowledge holder contribution

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A research paper on traditional fire management co-authored with named First Nations elders and the relevant community, with benefit-sharing agreements in place

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Citing Indigenous-published ecological knowledge without consent or community engagement is appropriation, not legitimate contribution credit

Editorial commentary

Indigenous knowledge holder contribution is substantive input to research from Indigenous knowledge keepers, elders, or community members who hold and share traditional knowledge, ecological observation, language, or cultural expertise relevant to the work. Credit for this contribution must be given on terms the community itself sets — collective community attribution, individually named credit with consent, or co-authorship — rather than terms the researcher unilaterally decides, in line with the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance.

How it differs from related terms: It shares the CARE-versus-FAIR framing common to data-governance concepts on this site, but differs from patient partner contribution and citizen scientist contribution in that the terms of engagement itself — not just the credit outcome — are set by the community’s own governance protocols, including benefit-sharing and the right to withdraw or refuse use of knowledge already shared.

Using Indigenous-held ecological or cultural knowledge without consent or community engagement, even where it has been previously published elsewhere, is treated as appropriation rather than a legitimate basis for contribution credit.

References

  • Global Indigenous Data Alliance (GIDA), CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (2019)
  • UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)

Also known as

Traditional knowledge holder contribution · Elder contribution

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Indigenous-knowledge holder contribution"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-knowledge-holder-contribution" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-knowledge-holder-contribution",
  "name": "Indigenous-knowledge holder contribution",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-knowledge-holder-contribution",
  "description": "Substantive contribution to research from Indigenous knowledge keepers, elders, or community members who hold and share traditional knowledge, ecological observations, language, or cultural expertise relevant to the research, in accordance with CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/credit-extensions#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-knowledge-holder-contribution",
  "sameAs": [
    "Traditional knowledge holder contribution",
    "Elder contribution"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T01:59:36",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:04:54",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.