Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EStablev2026.2

End-of-project review

A formal evaluative meeting or process held at or near a project's end to assess whether it met its stated objectives against the original plan, typically involving the funder's programme or project officer and, for larger awards, external experts -- distinct from a mid-project interim review, and from the later, broader impact evaluation that may follow independently.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about End-of-project review

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A Horizon Europe consortium presents its final results at a public end-of-project review meeting attended by the Project Officer and three external experts.

  • Is an instance

    A UKRI Strategic Priorities Fund programme has a final review including industry and policy stakeholders.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A mid-term review at project midpoint is not an end-of-project review.

  • Not an instance

    Routine final-report submission without a meeting is not the same as a formal end-of-project review.

Editorial commentary

An end-of-project review is a formal check, held at or shortly after a project’s completion, of whether the work delivered what it originally set out to do. It is usually a structured meeting or evaluative process, not simply the funder reading the final report in isolation — for larger or higher-profile awards it typically includes external experts alongside the funder’s own programme or project officer.

Timing and purpose

The review sits at project close, and its scope is deliberately bounded: it measures achievement against the project’s own original plan and objectives, using the final report as its primary evidence base. It is not asking whether the project changed the world — it is asking whether it did what it said it would do.

vs. interim project review

An interim project review happens at a defined mid-point, checks whether work is on track, and can trigger corrective action or affect continued funding while the project is still running. The end-of-project review happens once, after the work is finished, and looks backward at the complete record rather than forward at continued funding.

vs. impact evaluation

An end-of-project review and an impact evaluation are often confused because both happen around or after a project’s conclusion, but they ask different questions on different timescales. The end-of-project review asks whether the stated plan was delivered, using methods close to a structured progress check. Impact evaluation asks a broader question — what effect did this work actually have, including effects the original plan never specified — typically months or years later, using methods such as counterfactual comparison or theory-based evaluation, and sometimes assessed at a whole-portfolio level rather than for a single award.

Named examples

Horizon Europe consortium projects commonly hold a formal end-of-project review meeting with the Project Officer and external experts present; UKRI’s Strategic Priorities Fund programmes have run final reviews that include industry and policy stakeholders alongside the funder.

Also known as

Final project review · End-of-grant review · Final technical review

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="End-of-project review"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/end-of-project-review" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/end-of-project-review",
  "name": "End-of-project review",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/end-of-project-review",
  "description": "A formal evaluative meeting or process held at or near a project's end to assess whether it met its stated objectives against the original plan, typically involving the funder's programme or project officer and, for larger awards, external experts -- distinct from a mid-project interim review, and from the later, broader impact evaluation that may follow independently.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-lifecycle#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/end-of-project-review",
  "sameAs": [
    "Final project review",
    "End-of-grant review",
    "Final technical review"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:23:00",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T16:27:02",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.