Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EProposedv2026.2

Impact evaluation

A systematic assessment of the effects a piece of research or a research programme has had -- often extending beyond its own stated objectives -- using methods such as counterfactual or comparison-group designs, contribution analysis, or theory-based evaluation. Typically conducted after project completion, sometimes at a portfolio level across many awards, and distinct from a single project's end-of-project review.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Impact evaluation

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A funder commissions independent contribution-analysis evaluation of a 5-year research programme.

  • Is an instance

    An institution conducts portfolio-level impact evaluation by aggregating case studies across departments.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Reporting impact-evaluation findings based on author self-report with no triangulation.

  • Not an instance

    Claiming attribution without identifying counterfactual evidence or contribution pathway.

Editorial commentary

Impact evaluation asks a broader and later question than most other project-end assessments: not “did the project deliver what it said it would,” but “what effect did this work actually have,” including effects the original project plan never anticipated. It is a distinct evaluative discipline with its own methods, not simply a more thorough version of a progress check.

Timing: after, not at, project end

An end-of-project review happens at or shortly after completion and measures delivery against the original plan. Impact evaluation is typically conducted later — often months or years after project completion — because meaningful downstream effects (policy uptake, changed clinical practice, a technology reaching market, a shift in a field’s research direction) usually take time to materialize and cannot be reliably assessed the moment funding ends.

Common methods

Because attributing a real-world effect to a specific piece of research is methodologically hard, impact evaluation relies on more rigorous designs than a self-reported outcomes list: counterfactual or comparison-group designs (what would have happened without this research), contribution analysis (building a credible case for the research’s role among several contributing factors, without claiming sole causation), and theory-based evaluation, which tests whether the causal chain set out in a project’s original theory of change actually played out as expected.

Who conducts it, and at what scale

Impact evaluation is commonly conducted by a funder’s own evaluation unit or by independent evaluators, rather than by the project team producing its own review meeting. It is also frequently conducted at a portfolio level — assessing the aggregate effect of a funding programme across many awards — rather than project by project, which is one further way it differs from a single award’s end-of-project or interim review.

What weak impact evaluation looks like

Findings built solely on author self-report, with no independent triangulation, or a claim of attribution with no identified counterfactual or contribution pathway, do not meet the bar this discipline sets for itself — both are common failure modes flagged in research-evaluation methodology.

Also known as

Research impact evaluation · Impact assessment

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Impact evaluation"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/impact-evaluation" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/impact-evaluation",
  "name": "Impact evaluation",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/impact-evaluation",
  "description": "A systematic assessment of the effects a piece of research or a research programme has had -- often extending beyond its own stated objectives -- using methods such as counterfactual or comparison-group designs, contribution analysis, or theory-based evaluation. Typically conducted after project completion, sometimes at a portfolio level across many awards, and distinct from a single project's end-of-project review.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/engagement-impact-sdg#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/impact-evaluation",
  "sameAs": [
    "Research impact evaluation",
    "Impact assessment"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:56",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T16:27:11",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.