Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack DStablev2026.2

Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)

The right of Indigenous Peoples to give or withhold consent to actions affecting them, their territories, or their resources, where consent is freely given, sought sufficiently in advance, and based on full and accessible information about the proposed activity.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A research consortium documents its FPIC process with each participating Indigenous community before commencing data collection.

  • Is an instance

    A community exercises its right to withdraw consent partway through a project, and the research team adjusts accordingly.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    Standard institutional ethics consent forms targeting individual participants do not, on their own, satisfy FPIC at the community level.

  • Not an instance

    Notification of communities about activities already underway is not FPIC, which requires consent in advance.

Editorial commentary

FPIC is articulated in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and is widely recognised in international human rights and data governance frameworks. In research contexts, FPIC requires meaningful engagement with relevant communities before research commences, ongoing communication and the option to withdraw consent, and respect for community decision-making structures. FPIC is a process, not a single event, and is closely connected with cultural protocols, benefit sharing, and CARE-aligned practice.

Origins in UNDRIP

UNDRIP, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2007, is the primary international instrument articulating FPIC. Provisions commonly cited as its FPIC core include Article 10 (no forced relocation without free, prior and informed consent), Article 19 (states to consult and cooperate to obtain FPIC before adopting legislative or administrative measures affecting Indigenous Peoples), Article 29 (FPIC before storage or disposal of hazardous materials on Indigenous lands), and Article 32 (FPIC before approval of projects affecting Indigenous lands, territories, or resources). UNDRIP is a declaration, not a binding treaty, but it is treated as the reference articulation of FPIC across national research-ethics and data-governance frameworks.

FPIC as a collective process, not individual consent

FPIC differs structurally from individual informed consent in human-subjects research: it is sought from a community, nation, or its recognised representative body — not (only) from each individual participant — and it addresses the research relationship and its use of collective knowledge, land, or data as a whole, in addition to whatever individual consent each participant separately provides. A study can have full individual informed consent from every participant and still lack FPIC if it was never brought to, or approved by, the community’s own governance structures.

How FPIC connects to CARE, OCAP, and national frameworks

FPIC is a consent principle; the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (developed by the Global Indigenous Data Alliance, GIDA) and Canada’s OCAP Principles (Ownership, Control, Access, Possession — First Nations Information Governance Centre) are the data-governance frameworks that operationalise consent-adjacent rights once research or data collection is underway. In Canada, the Tri-Council Policy Statement’s TCPS2 Chapter 9 is the specific research-ethics-board compliance mechanism through which community engagement and agreement — closely related to, though not formally labelled, FPIC — is reviewed and required for research involving First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples. These frameworks are complementary, not interchangeable, and a research office should not assume satisfying one automatically satisfies the others.

References

Related: Indigenous Data Sovereignty · Benefit-sharing agreement · Traditional Knowledge (TK) · CARE Principles vs. FAIR Principles.

Also known as

FPIC

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/free-prior-and-informed-consent-fpic" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/free-prior-and-informed-consent-fpic",
  "name": "Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/free-prior-and-informed-consent-fpic",
  "description": "The right of Indigenous Peoples to give or withhold consent to actions affecting them, their territories, or their resources, where consent is freely given, sought sufficiently in advance, and based on full and accessible information about the proposed activity.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/indigenous-data-care#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/free-prior-and-informed-consent-fpic",
  "sameAs": [
    "FPIC"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:54",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T12:18:11",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.