Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack DProposedv2026.2

Indigenous community review

Indigenous community review is a review of proposed or completed research by a body the community itself designates — such as an elders' council, community research ethics committee, or governance body — assessing alignment with community priorities and cultural protocols, separate from or alongside institutional ethics review.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Indigenous community review

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A research proposal undergoes a community ethics review by a council of elders before institutional ethics submission.

  • Is an instance

    Data access requests are routed through a community-designated review body for decision.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    An institutional ethics review board operating without Indigenous community participation is not Indigenous community review.

  • Not an instance

    External advisory input from individual Indigenous scholars, while valuable, does not by itself constitute community review.

Editorial commentary

Indigenous community review is a review of proposed or completed research conducted by a body the community itself designates — an elders’ council, a dedicated community research ethics committee, a governance body, or another structure of the community’s own choosing. It typically assesses research design, anticipated benefits and risks, alignment with community priorities, and adherence to cultural protocols. Its form and authority are determined entirely by the community, not by a fixed external template.

Relationship to institutional review and FPIC

Indigenous community review may parallel or supplement, rather than replace, a university or funder’s institutional research ethics board (REB) review, and it is often a condition of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) at the community level. Where a jurisdiction has a specific compliance mechanism for this — for example, Chapter 9 of Canada’s Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2), which addresses research involving Indigenous peoples — that mechanism calls for institutional REB review to be complemented by community-level review where a recognized community authority exists, rather than treating institutional approval as sufficient on its own.

What it is not

Indigenous community review is a specific review event or process, not the same as the broader governance model of community-controlled research, in which the community holds ongoing authority over the whole project rather than a review checkpoint within it; a project can include community review at one stage without being community-controlled overall, and vice versa. It is closely related to, but not identical with, the data-governance-specific commitments in the CARE Principles, OCAP, Te Mana Raraunga, and Maiam nayri Wingara — those frameworks govern data specifically, while community review can extend to the full research design, methods, and dissemination plan.

In practice

Where a formal research agreement is set out with a designated community representative before recruitment begins, it should address data ownership, access, and control; reporting findings back to the community; review of publications before they go out; and a dispute-resolution process, so that the review’s authority and scope are clear to all parties from the outset rather than negotiated after a disagreement arises.

References

Also known as

community research review · community ethics review

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Indigenous community review"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-community-review" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-community-review",
  "name": "Indigenous community review",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-community-review",
  "description": "Indigenous community review is a review of proposed or completed research by a body the community itself designates — such as an elders' council, community research ethics committee, or governance body — assessing alignment with community priorities and cultural protocols, separate from or alongside institutional ethics review.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/indigenous-data-care#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/indigenous-community-review",
  "sameAs": [
    "community research review",
    "community ethics review"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:54",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T15:51:30",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.