Examples
Worked examples
- Is an instance
A funder publishes an annual equity index across its portfolio covering author geography, language and output type.
- Is an instance
A national OA dashboard tracks open access by discipline, language and country.
Counter-examples
Looks similar, but isn't
- Not an instance
A 'diversity index' that aggregates only Northern English-language sources.
- Not an instance
Treating a single composite index value as definitive without disaggregated reporting.
Editorial commentary
Knowledge equity indices vary in design but typically combine indicators across several dimensions: geographic representation in authorship, editorial boards and citations; language diversity in publication and indexing; access (reader and author barriers); recognition of diverse output types; demographic equity within research workforces; and infrastructure ownership. There is no single, universally-adopted “Knowledge Equity Index” product — the term describes a family of measurement approaches rather than one named instrument, and content or policy that treats it as a single official index should be treated with caution.
A concrete example: the COKI Open Access Dashboard
The Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative (COKI), founded in 2017 at Curtin University in Australia, is a real, verifiable example of this kind of measurement work: it assembles a large open bibliographic and OA-status dataset and publishes an Open Access Dashboard measuring institutional- and country-level open access uptake, alongside dedicated work on open access and equity, justice and diversity questions. It is one input a research office can use to benchmark its own OA and equity posture — not a certifying or accrediting body.
Other monitoring frameworks in this space
UNESCO’s Open Science monitoring framework and various national-level OA monitoring tools (see that entry for the French and Dutch examples) take a similar multi-dimensional approach at government or funder scale rather than institution scale. The common thread across all of them is the emphasis that equitable knowledge systems are measurable, and that improvement requires explicit, disaggregated metrics rather than a single composite score.
References
- Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative (openknowledge.community). UNESCO Open Science monitoring framework, 2023.
Also known as
Equity metrics (knowledge) · Open knowledge index
Machine-readable encodings
Use in your systems
<role vocab="credit"
vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
vocab-term="Knowledge Equity Index"
vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-equity-index" />{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "DefinedTerm",
"@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-equity-index",
"name": "Knowledge Equity Index",
"identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-equity-index",
"description": "A composite measure or framework that quantifies how equitably knowledge production, dissemination and access are distributed across geographies, languages, disciplines, demographics or career stages.",
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/knowledge-equity#set",
"url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/knowledge-equity-index",
"sameAs": [
"Equity metrics (knowledge)",
"Open knowledge index"
],
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"publisher": {
"@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
},
"author": {
"@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
},
"datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:56",
"dateModified": "2026-08-23T05:14:28",
"inLanguage": "en-GB",
"isAccessibleForFree": true
}
