Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EProposedv2026.2

Pathway to impact

A mandatory, standalone section of UKRI grant applications, required from 2009 and formally removed from March 2020, in which applicants identified likely beneficiaries, planned activities, and the mechanisms linking research outputs to societal effects. Historical, not a current requirement.

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 22 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Pathway to impact

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A 2015 UKRI grant application included a two-page Pathway to Impact attachment naming policy beneficiaries and a public-engagement timeline, separate from the scientific case for support.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A 2024 UKRI application does not include a Pathway to Impact attachment; impact is instead addressed throughout the application narrative itself, since the standalone section was removed in March 2020.

Editorial commentary

Pathway to Impact was a mandatory, standalone section of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) grant applications from 2009 until it was formally removed from March 2020, following a decision agreed by UKRI’s Executive Committee in December 2019. It is now a historical requirement, not a current one — a page or applicant guidance describing it as something still required today would be wrong, and out of date advice on this point has real consequences for applicants preparing a current UKRI proposal.

What it required, while it existed

A Pathway to Impact statement (alongside a separate Impact Summary) asked applicants to identify likely beneficiaries of the research, the activities planned to reach them, intermediate milestones, and the assumed mechanisms linking research outputs to eventual societal or economic effects — submitted as a distinct attachment through the Je-S application system, separate from the scientific case for support.

Why it was removed, and what replaced it

UKRI’s stated rationale was to reduce the administrative burden of preparing a separate document and to embed consideration of impact throughout the research proposal itself, rather than siloing it into one attachment written (in practice, often late and formulaically) alongside the main case. Impact is now expected to be considered intrinsically, at appropriate points across the application narrative, rather than declared once in a dedicated section. The change was genuinely contested in the UK research community at the time — some welcomed less bureaucracy, others worried that removing a mandatory, visible section would let impact planning quietly slip down applicants’ priorities.

How this differs from a theory of change or an impact evaluation

A pathway statement (where still used, by name or in substance, by other funders) is more activity-specific and time-bound than a theory of change, which maps a fuller causal logic from activities to long-term outcomes independent of any one grant. It is also prospective — written before the research happens — unlike an impact evaluation or a REF impact case study, both of which assess impact retrospectively, after it has (or hasn’t) occurred. Comparable prospective-impact expectations persist under different names at other funders — for example, the US NSF’s Broader Impacts merit-review criterion — even where the UK’s specific standalone section has gone.

References

  • UKRI guidance on impact (historical, pre-2020 requirement); NESTA, ‘Innovating for impact’ (2020).

Also known as

Pathway statement · Impact pathway

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Pathway to impact"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/pathway-to-impact" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/pathway-to-impact",
  "name": "Pathway to impact",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/pathway-to-impact",
  "description": "A mandatory, standalone section of UKRI grant applications, required from 2009 and formally removed from March 2020, in which applicants identified likely beneficiaries, planned activities, and the mechanisms linking research outputs to societal effects. Historical, not a current requirement.",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/engagement-impact-sdg#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/pathway-to-impact",
  "sameAs": [
    "Pathway statement",
    "Impact pathway"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:22:57",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-22T16:26:29",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.