Skip to main content
v2026.11,772 entries · CC-BY 4.0
Dictionary termTrack EProposedv2026.2

Post-project sustainability

Post-project sustainability is the broader planning question a funder increasingly expects an applicant to answer: what continues, and how, once dedicated project funding stops? It sits at proposal and reporting stage as a distinct planning requirement in its own right — Horizon Europe's sustainability plans, NIH's data-management and sharing expectations, and UKRI's exploitation plans are the most commonly cited funder-specific forms it takes. The questions it typically has to answer Who will maintain project-built software once the grant ends and dedicated developer time disappears; ho

ByCASRAI Editorial Board
· Last updated 23 Aug 2026
Share this

Ask CASRAI · included with Regulatory Radar

Ask about Post-project sustainability

Ask CASRAI answers research-administration questions and cites the passages behind every claim — and says so when the corpus does not cover something, instead of guessing. It comes with a Regulatory Radar subscription at $29 a month, alongside the daily digest of regulatory changes and the dashboard of what changed.

150 questions a day, on this site, over the API, or inside your own tools through the CASRAI MCP server.

Everything CASRAI publishes — this page, the dictionary, the guides and the news — stays free to read, with no account and no card.

Examples

Worked examples

  • Is an instance

    A consortium documents that its open-source software will be maintained for at least 3 years post-project by a designated partner, with infrastructure funded from institutional commitment.

  • Is an instance

    A research data centre commits to host the project's dataset for at least 10 years with a published preservation policy.

Counter-examples

Looks similar, but isn't

  • Not an instance

    A short-lived demo website with no maintenance plan is the opposite of sustainability.

  • Not an instance

    Treating outputs as disposable at project end shows no sustainability planning.

Editorial commentary

Post-project sustainability is the broader planning question a funder increasingly expects an applicant to answer: what continues, and how, once dedicated project funding stops? It sits at proposal and reporting stage as a distinct planning requirement in its own right — Horizon Europe’s sustainability plans, NIH’s data-management and sharing expectations, and UKRI’s exploitation plans are the most commonly cited funder-specific forms it takes.

The questions it typically has to answer

Who will maintain project-built software once the grant ends and dedicated developer time disappears; how a dataset will remain accessible and usable in five or ten years; whether a community of practice the project convened will keep meeting without project funding to support it; whether there is a realistic route to follow-on funding; whether there is a plausible path to commercial sustainability for a technology output, potentially via consortium partners or institutional tech-transfer; and whether outputs will be formally transferred to a permanent host — an institution, a learned society, or an open-source foundation — rather than simply left where the project happened to leave them.

vs. output legacy planning

Post-project sustainability is the broader question set; output legacy planning is the more specific, execution-level practice of actually preserving and licensing tangible outputs (depositing data/software with a persistent identifier under an open licence) and arranging succession for non-static outputs such as a recurring workshop series or shared tool. A strong post-project sustainability answer at proposal stage should be backed by a concrete output legacy plan, not stop at the general intention.

Why it gets flagged

Lack of credible sustainability planning is a long-running critique of project-funded research generally — reviewers and funders have grown more willing to score a proposal down, or a final report as incomplete, when this question is answered only in general aspirational terms rather than with a specific plan, owner, and timeline.

References

  • European Commission, Horizon Europe Sustainability Plans guidance; NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy.

Also known as

Sustainability plan · Post-grant sustainability · Long-term sustainability (project)

Machine-readable encodings

Use in your systems

JATS XML <role> element
xml
<role vocab="credit"
      vocab-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/"
      vocab-term="Post-project sustainability"
      vocab-term-identifier="https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/post-project-sustainability" />
Schema.org DefinedTerm (JSON-LD)
json
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "DefinedTerm",
  "@id": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/post-project-sustainability",
  "name": "Post-project sustainability",
  "identifier": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/post-project-sustainability",
  "description": "Post-project sustainability is the broader planning question a funder increasingly expects an applicant to answer: what continues, and how, once dedicated project funding stops? It sits at proposal and reporting stage as a distinct planning requirement in its own right — Horizon Europe's sustainability plans, NIH's data-management and sharing expectations, and UKRI's exploitation plans are the most commonly cited funder-specific forms it takes. The questions it typically has to answer Who will maintain project-built software once the grant ends and dedicated developer time disappears; ho",
  "inDefinedTermSet": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/domain/research-lifecycle#set",
  "url": "https://casrai.org/dictionary/term/post-project-sustainability",
  "sameAs": [
    "Sustainability plan",
    "Post-grant sustainability",
    "Long-term sustainability (project)"
  ],
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "publisher": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#organization"
  },
  "author": {
    "@id": "https://casrai.org/#editorial-team"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-05-21T02:23:00",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-23T04:57:40",
  "inLanguage": "en-GB",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true
}

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →

Regulatory Radar

Stop finding out after the fact

$29/month, cancel anytime. Daily digest updates from our analysis, a dashboard holding the same items, and a cited assistant for everything they raise.

  • Federal Register, Federal Register+, Grants.gov, Regulations.gov, NSF News, UKRI, plus CASRAI’s own published content.
  • 72,264 indexed passages, and every answer cites the ones it drew on.