Skip to main content
v2026.11,858 entries · CC-BY 4.0
NIKOLAI elementN2 · Threat models and risk framingProposednikolai-v0.1

Threat-Actor Profile

NIKOLAI editorial proposal (unsourced): a threat-actor profile is the capability, resource and access class of the adversary a threshold, evaluation or safeguard is calibrated against, expressed as a value on a ladder (e.g. novice/individual through nation-state) rather than as free text. This is element B3 of the source crosswalk.

This is CASRAI's own proposed definition, not a definition any named organisation has agreed to. See what NIKOLAI is and is not.

Source of record

Where this definition comes from

Crosswalk

How named organisations use this concept

Every row below is a shadow mapping. A shadow row is CASRAI's own reading of a published document. No lab, evaluator or regulator named on a shadow row has declared, endorsed, or been consulted on it. That changes only when an organisation files its own Mapping Declaration.
OrganisationTheir term, as publishedMatch & verificationSource
AnthropicShadow mapping
Anthropic Risk Report, August 2026
CB-1: "Individuals or small groups with limited resources"; CB-2: "Moderately resourced threat actors (including, for example, expert-backed teams)" (§4.1). "Medium-strength attacker": "an attacker with the strength that a human red-teamer shows when editing a transcript without iterating against a monitor ..." (§2.11.1). "Sophisticated insiders": "insiders who have persistent access or can request time-limited access to systems that process model weights" (§6.4.1 fn 90).exactEQ
confidence: high
Anthropic Risk Report, August 2026
OpenAIShadow mapping
Preparedness Framework v2 / GPT-5.6 deployment safety report
"Novice actor (Bio): anyone with a basic relevant technical background" (Table 1). Critical: "The model can enable an expert to develop a highly dangerous novel threat vector" (Table 1). GPT-5.6: "Spray and pray operations": "broad exploitation by moderately skilled, low-resourced individuals and small groups" (s.9.4.1.2).closeCL
confidence: high
OpenAI Preparedness Framework v2
Google DeepMindShadow mapping
Gemini 3.7 Flash FSF report / FSF v3.1
"Provides low to medium resourced actors uplift in reference scenarios" (CBRN Uplift 1 CCL). Threat Actor Capability levels "TAC-1" ("programmer with limited cybersecurity knowledge (e.g., 'script kiddie')") to "TAC-4" ("95th+ percentile cybersecurity expert (e.g., nation-state-sponsored groups)") (report p.16). FSF refers to RAND "OC3 groups" without defining them (p.11).exactEQ
confidence: high
Gemini 3.7 Flash FSF report
xAIShadow mapping
xAI Frontier AI Framework (30 Jun 2026)
Security Goal threat actors: "sophisticated non-state actors, insider threats, state-sponsored actors and other foreseeable actors" (s.2.4). This is a security-only construct, narrower than the malicious-use threat-actor profiles used elsewhere in the corpus.
PDF metadata /Title reads "Privileged/Confidential DRAFT working FRAMEWORK DOC"; no xAI statement disambiguating draft vs. final was found.
narrowNR
confidence: medium
xAI Frontier AI Framework (30 Jun 2026, draft-marked)
MetaShadow mapping
Meta Advanced AI Scaling Framework v2
Scenarios cover "both state and non-state actors" and distinguish "high- and low-skill actors" (para., §1.1); CB 1: "Proliferation of known medium-impact biological or chemical weapons for low and moderate skill actors" (§3.4).closeCL
confidence: high
Meta Advanced AI Scaling Framework v2
EUShadow mapping
EU GPAI Code of Practice, Safety and Security chapter
Measure 6.1 "Security Goal": Signatories "will define a goal that specifies the threat actors that their security mitigations are intended to protect against ..., including non-state external threats, insider threats, and other expected threat actors, taking into account at least the current and expected capabilities of their models" — a security-only threat-actor construct, distinct from malicious-use threat-actor profiles used elsewhere in the corpus, confirming xAI's own adoption of the same term.
Row also cites xAI's Frontier AI Framework, whose PDF metadata is marked "DRAFT working FRAMEWORK DOC" with no disambiguating xAI statement found.
closeCL
confidence: high
EU GPAI Code of Practice, Safety and Security chapter
What do these codes mean?
exact
The source term is equivalent to this element
close
The source term is close but not equivalent to this element
broad
The source term is broader than this element
narrow
The source term is narrower than this element
none
No mapping claim — used for false-friend and declared-but-undefined rows
EQ
Equivalent
CL
Close
BR
Source is broader than the element
NR
Source is narrower than the element
FF
False friend — same or similar label, different meaning
DU
Declared but undefined by the source
UV
Unverified

Related, not mapped

Pointers that are not crosswalk claims

These sources mention this concept but do not define or map it clearly enough to count as a crosswalk row — noted here so the research is visible without overstating it as a mapping.

Referenced across the research world

University of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logoUniversity of Cambridge logoColumbia University logoCrossref logoUniversity of Edinburgh logoHarvard University logoUniversity of Oxford logoPrinceton University logoStanford School of Medicine logoUniversity College London logoORCID logo
  • University of Cambridge logo
  • Columbia University logo
  • Crossref logo
  • University of Edinburgh logo
  • Harvard University logo
  • University of Oxford logo
  • Princeton University logo
  • Stanford School of Medicine logo
  • University College London logo
  • ORCID logo

View CASRAI adoption →